It was said to be the biggest scam in the history of Independent India. The Time Magazine has called it the second biggest instance of the abuse of executive power- just a notch below Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal.
Exactly ten years back, when the murmurs of wrongdoings were first heard in the corridors of powers in Delhi, the opposition demanded an investigation.
Politically however, irregularities in the allocation of Second Generation spectrum licenses for mobile communication and limited data transmission was too complex a subject for public comprehension or popular political lexicon.
Only when the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in a report quantified and pegged the scam loss to Rs. 1,76 lac crores that the scandal took its own definitive shape and moniker- the 2G Scam.
The case was investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation which filed an 80,000 page chargesheet before the trial court.
WHAT IS SPECTRUM SCAM?
On 16th November 2010, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), the supreme auditing body of the country came out with its report on the issuance of licenses and allocation of 2G spectrum by the Department of Telecom.
CAG, then headed Vinod Rai, revealed 2G licenses had been issued to telecom operators at throwaway prices causing a loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the exchequer. Moreover, licenses had been issued to ineligible applicants who had deliberately suppressed facts, disclosed incomplete information, submitted fictitious documents and used fraudulent means for getting licenses and thereby access to spectrum.
The CAG report went on to say that licenses owners had in turn sold significant stakes to the Indian/foreign companies at high premium within a short period of time.
The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was estimated to be the true value of the spectrum.
In a free and fair bidding process, these profits should have accrued to the public exchequer.
THE ALLEGATIONS
The telecom ministry under A Raja changed rules and eligibility criteria several times in the run-up to auction.
The cut-off date of the auction was advanced by the ministry.
The ministry issued licenses on a distorted First Come First Served (FCFS) Policy and that too at 2001 prices, not at 2008 prices.
Officials at the ministry allegedly shut counters to physically block selected telecom companies from entering the fray.
Telecom Minister Raja acted against the advice of TRAI, Law Ministry, Finance Ministry.
Exactly ten years back, when the murmurs of wrongdoings were first heard in the corridors of powers in Delhi, the opposition demanded an investigation.
Politically however, irregularities in the allocation of Second Generation spectrum licenses for mobile communication and limited data transmission was too complex a subject for public comprehension or popular political lexicon.
Only when the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in a report quantified and pegged the scam loss to Rs. 1,76 lac crores that the scandal took its own definitive shape and moniker- the 2G Scam.
The case was investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation which filed an 80,000 page chargesheet before the trial court.
WHAT IS SPECTRUM SCAM?
On 16th November 2010, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), the supreme auditing body of the country came out with its report on the issuance of licenses and allocation of 2G spectrum by the Department of Telecom.
CAG, then headed Vinod Rai, revealed 2G licenses had been issued to telecom operators at throwaway prices causing a loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the exchequer. Moreover, licenses had been issued to ineligible applicants who had deliberately suppressed facts, disclosed incomplete information, submitted fictitious documents and used fraudulent means for getting licenses and thereby access to spectrum.
The CAG report went on to say that licenses owners had in turn sold significant stakes to the Indian/foreign companies at high premium within a short period of time.
The premium earned by these new entrants to the telecom sector was estimated to be the true value of the spectrum.
In a free and fair bidding process, these profits should have accrued to the public exchequer.
THE ALLEGATIONS
The telecom ministry under A Raja changed rules and eligibility criteria several times in the run-up to auction.
The cut-off date of the auction was advanced by the ministry.
The ministry issued licenses on a distorted First Come First Served (FCFS) Policy and that too at 2001 prices, not at 2008 prices.
Officials at the ministry allegedly shut counters to physically block selected telecom companies from entering the fray.
Telecom Minister Raja acted against the advice of TRAI, Law Ministry, Finance Ministry.