Madras High Court has ordered a CBI probe into an alleged ₹397 crore transformer tender scam during Senthil Balaji’s tenure, directing DVAC to transfer files and ensure full cooperation for investigation.
Coimbatore:
The Madras High Court has ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into alleged irregularities in transformer tender procurement worth ₹397 crore during the tenure of former Electricity Minister Senthil Balaji between 2021 and 2023.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice SA Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan directed the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to transfer all case-related files to the CBI. The court instructed that an investigating officer be appointed within two weeks to take charge of the probe.
The court also ordered a de novo investigation by the CBI based on the available materials and directed the State government, TANGEDCO, and DVAC to extend full cooperation to the central agency. Authorities have been asked to ensure that all relevant documents are submitted to facilitate an effective investigation.
The High Court further directed the CBI to conduct the probe in a time-bound and thorough manner and submit a report. A detailed order in the case is expected to be released later.
The petitions seeking a probe were filed by Arappor Iyakkam and members affiliated with various political parties, alleging large-scale irregularities in the awarding of transformer tenders. The petitioners told the court that despite submitting representations to the State government, no action had been taken, prompting them to approach the judiciary.
During earlier hearings, the bench had sought details of the preliminary enquiry conducted by the DVAC. Petitioners also raised concerns over delays in granting sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act to initiate prosecution against the former minister. The State later informed the court that the sanction had been granted.
The State government opposed the petitions, arguing that they were politically motivated and filed ahead of elections. However, the court observed that serious allegations cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of the petitioners’ political affiliations.
Clarifying its stance, the court stated that its observations pertain only to the need for an independent investigation and should not influence the merits of the case.
The Madras High Court has ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into alleged irregularities in transformer tender procurement worth ₹397 crore during the tenure of former Electricity Minister Senthil Balaji between 2021 and 2023.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice SA Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan directed the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to transfer all case-related files to the CBI. The court instructed that an investigating officer be appointed within two weeks to take charge of the probe.
The court also ordered a de novo investigation by the CBI based on the available materials and directed the State government, TANGEDCO, and DVAC to extend full cooperation to the central agency. Authorities have been asked to ensure that all relevant documents are submitted to facilitate an effective investigation.
The High Court further directed the CBI to conduct the probe in a time-bound and thorough manner and submit a report. A detailed order in the case is expected to be released later.
The petitions seeking a probe were filed by Arappor Iyakkam and members affiliated with various political parties, alleging large-scale irregularities in the awarding of transformer tenders. The petitioners told the court that despite submitting representations to the State government, no action had been taken, prompting them to approach the judiciary.
During earlier hearings, the bench had sought details of the preliminary enquiry conducted by the DVAC. Petitioners also raised concerns over delays in granting sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act to initiate prosecution against the former minister. The State later informed the court that the sanction had been granted.
The State government opposed the petitions, arguing that they were politically motivated and filed ahead of elections. However, the court observed that serious allegations cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of the petitioners’ political affiliations.
Clarifying its stance, the court stated that its observations pertain only to the need for an independent investigation and should not influence the merits of the case.